The account of the burying of the Nag Hammadi library has become close to legendary. It’s even a sort of rallying cry for minority faiths navigating the icebergs of mainstream religions. However, the latest scholarship paints a difference picture. This picture is perhaps more intriguing than the accepted view of the storage of these so-called Gnostic Gospels. And far more occult.
The Traditional Version of Why the Nag Hammadi Library Was Buried
Elaine Pagels explains the accepted account on the Nag Hammadi library, which has its roots in the alluring idea of overcoming censorship:
Their suppression as banned documents, and their burial on the cliff at Nag Hammadi, it turns out, were both part of a struggle critical for the formation of early Christianity. The Nag Hammadi texts, and others like them, which circulated at the beginning of the Christian era, were denounced as heresy by orthodox Christians in the middle of the second century.
Matters only got worse for the Gnostics, according to historical data. In 367 AD, Athanasius, the formidable Bishop of Alexandria, issued a decree known as the Festal Letter, banning the use of alternative Christian writings. Also, he outlined an accepted canon of orthodox scripture. In reaction to this censorship, brave monks from the St Pachomius Monastery in Upper Egypt smuggled out codices and buried them in the nearby sands. These 52 texts were discovered in 1945 close to the town of Nag Hammadi.
When it comes down to it, this theory on the burial of the Nag Hammadi library is highly speculative. It’s also a rather romantic reconstruction in the spirit of a “repressed minority religion” trope that seems to play well with the Gnostic narrative (the perennial repressed minority religion throughout history). In the end, though, the traditional version has more gaps than the pages of the Nag Hammadi texts themselves.
Why the Traditional Version Just Doesn’t Work
In Introduction to “Gnosticism”
As Lewis commented on my show, historians have found no other cases of Christian monks hiding banned works from their religion in any region of the world. In her book, Lewis furthermore indicates that the composition of the Nag Hammadi library “probably came from a typical Egyptian town dump rather than from a monastery, suggesting that the covers of the books, if not the whole books themselves, were produced in an urban environment in the middle of the fourth century.”
In other words, the texts possibly came from a private collection, temple, or learning center. Lewis furthermore adds these reasons why they never originated in the St Pachomius Monastery, drawing from scholars who specialize in Pachomian monasticism:
- The 4th century is too early for Pachomian monks to have organized scripture.
- The texts themselves bear no traces of having physicially come out of that setting.
- If they derived from a Pachomian setting, The monks left no trace on the way that Pachomians thoughts and behaved as Christians.
Therefore, we can reasonably remove rebelling friars from the list of suspects.
Then why were the texts buried? The plot thickens, it seems, and this is where it gets truly mystical.
A More Precise Version of Why The Nag Hammadi Library Was Buried
Lewis points out that the most prevalent theme in the Nag Hammadi library is the topography of the metaphysical realms. Moreover, historians have found many books buried in Egypt whose central theme is death and the otherworlds. These works were placed next to the deceased in tombs. In fact, placing books with the recently deceased was not uncommon in that region even during the early Christian era.
Thus, it remains unclear who exactly buried the Nag Hammadi library, but the why becomes clear.
In short: The Nag Hammadi library is a funerary text—in the same genre as the Egyptian Book of the Dead or the Pyramid Texts (though at a more bourgeois level). Due to their heavy content on out-of-body experiences, the map of the astral planes, and password protocols for heavenly gatekeepers, these texts served as guidance for that particular soul leaving the body on its journey to the afterlife.
Lewis summarizes this alternative theory in her book:
They were simply deposited in graves as a sort of “grave good”; it was not an unusual instance in late ancient Egypt to bury a book in a tomb, since books were luxury items that might demonstrate the prestige and wealth of their owner. Some even speculate that there was a connection between the writings in NH books and a preoccupation about the nature of the afterlife; this is a major theme in many of the individual tractates in the Nag Hammadi collection.
Conclusion
In my view, Lewis’ scholarship makes the Nag Hammadi library more compelling and unified. Scholars have wrestled for decades with the question of why the alleged-monks chose these particular texts for burial. The best answer is that they were in a hurry with the Orthodox shadow of Athanasius looming over Egypt. As funerary texts, on the other hand, a better explanation is provided.
Furthermore, as I told Gordon White in my interview on Runesoup, this might be the reason sex magic works are absent from the Nag Hammadi library (even if both church fathers and Pagan philosophers claimed they were part of the Alexandrian Gnostic praxis). Sexual rituals are irrelevant to the soul’s voyage across the heavens and hells. Obviously, I’m speculating myself, but it’s no more far-fetched than the account scholarship has given the world since the discovery of the so-called Gnostic Gospels.
The Nag Hammadi library might be less about the views of ancient heretics and more about the universal preoccupation on the spirit’s voyage into eternity after the monkey-suit reaches its expiration date. This is a notion any monk, bishop, or seeker of higher truths can relate to, now and then.
I don’t find the argument convincing..
Were there any skeletons/sarcophagi/artifacts discovered around? No.
Just giant jars loaded with documents.
And who was the deceased? Sethian? Valentinian? You have documents from various sects which rejected each other.
Who were the church fathers who claimed the Gnostics had sex magic documents? The only case I can think of is Epiphaneus when he claimed the Gnostics had a book called The Greater Questions of Mary. But Epiphaneus is not reliable and he may have made the whole thing up to fuel hatred against the Gnostics.
We certainly cannot trust the church fathers. However, Plotinius and Celsus claim the sexual rituals of the Gnostics, and they are reliable (everything else they said about Gnostic Christians was correct).
As far as the site, the texts were found in the antiques market with some wild stories attached to them. I don’t think we really know where they were originally buried.
They were found by Muhammad Ali (Not the boxer 🙂 ) in Dec 1945 . I, too, am Egyptian but I come from Alexandria not upper Egypt (the south). They were in a giant Jar but there was nobody buried around.
http://blogs.libraries.claremont.edu/cceps/2015/02/rainy-day-files.html
The main reason for burying them was to suppress the TRUTH. What came out of the Roman Empire that holds a great footing in society?? Roman Catholic Church is the answer. What do you think all those monks were doing writing in the monasteries? History says that they were writing and rewriting scripture as pentance. Lmao, they were rewriting the Bible that’s what it was. Ask yourself who and what has brought more death and destruction on this world?? Don’t forget about the Inquisition!! They went around the world decimating the populations under the pretense of ” convert or die”. Huuuummmm, sounds like a really great religion to be apart of. What came out of the Roman Catholic Church?? All other forms of Christianity!!!! Man people are dumb. Famous philosopher said “Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshiping, Hubert Reeves.” This is why the Nag Hamadi was buried because Gnostiscism would have taken over the old Rule of Thought and our world would be very different indeed. The Bible is nothing but facts mixed in with fantasy and you you have to weed through the BS. Book of Enoch coincidently fits in history because we can actually fit the accounts with VISUAL sites around the world and the COMMONALITIES of ALL the previous cultures of coming from reptile beings. Thus once you enter that realm you put yourself up for some major persecution and ridicule. Because oh noooooooo, they don’t want you to know the TRUTH, they want you CONTROLED. What better way to control a civilization then to put a person, let’s use Jesus for instance, up on a pedistool and say he was God incarnate so you as a human can’t do what Jesus did which was save it’s people from a false reality because he was God. What people miss is that he was an ACTIVIST!!! I believe he was a man just like you and me and was able to accomplish what many have not so they needed to “twist” the story around and manipulate, distort and corrupt the Truth. You wonder how that’s possible?? Lmao humor yourself today and first use Google as the search engine and type in ” defintion of socialism, communism etc” and see what you find out lol. First defintion you see given by Google should make you want to tear out your eye balls and hair lmao. I have alot more that I can’t write, more then welcome for any one to call me and have a respectful debate about what you think life is and reality is. Reality=Truth/Truth=Reality
858 344- 9243
Strange how a plausible answer was staring us in the face and we just didn’t see it. Given the content of the Nag Hammadi texts, this explanation really makes a lot of sense. Thanks for sharing it Miguel – your article just changed my way of looking at the reason for the buried texts (too bad we don’t have the archaeological evidence…).
Thanks and always good to hear from you, Laurence! In the end, any insights on the culture of the ancients, even Christians and Jews, is speculation and reconstruction. But some just make more sense than others.
Really? I sense a bios opinion here, it seems to me. When it comes to this topic of Religion, moreover Salvation, I myself only want the truth! And in that very recent quest for the truth, I have found the truth to go against my first 40 years of teachings.I was very shocked when the writer here said “the why becomes clear. ” CLEAR is a huge leap and overstatement! And that a seemingly very educated writer, could be clear on the issue of why the ancient manuscripts (Lost Gospels) were placed there in the first place. My opinion with the evidence I have came across so far, shows that whoever put them there, intended to preserve them in jars and in a location that is very plausible to say someone hid them, in a location that if and when found, it would take a while. Conclusion: No evidence here to support the idea of burying one’s riches here! No body found with them. Not placed in a sealed tomb for security against a disturbance. It was not common(I know of none ever recorded) to take steps of preserving ones possessions for the afterlife. Egyptians placed riches and possessions that one cared for, for the use of that person in the afterlife. Someone wanted to preserve these documents for sure, wich to me, shows there had to be a pretty significant reason(Conviction Even!) And, Preserving of manuscripts is always for the possible future use of. Not to show wealth(probably do like everyone else before you and use gold or silver for that it would be a lot easier)or anything selfish or personal in nature. Surely after all the laborious ascribing, making the parchments, inks needed, glass jars and Preserving materials needed, money needed. You probably had a good reason (to you at least to take the extraordinary measures of preserving them this way) and would want other (alive) people to read them too. Not sure if we will ever be SURE though! I will Seek the truth always for me and my loved ones. Peace and good will to all.
Have you actually read the text? Funerary text… Lol, come on. You’re not THAT blind… Are you?
“Now, since it has been said that you are my twin and true companion, examine yourself, and learn who you are, in what way you exist, and how you will come to be. Since you will be called my brother, it is not fitting that you be ignorant of yourself. And I know that you have understood, because you had already understood that I am the knowledge of the truth. So while you accompany me, although you are uncomprehending, you have (in fact) already come to know, and you will be called ‘the one who knows himself’. For he who has not known himself has known nothing, but he who has known himself has at the same time already achieved knowledge about the depth of the all. So then, you, my brother Thomas, have beheld what is obscure to men, that is, what they ignorantly stumble against.”